The Dink Network

Reply to Re: Avatar

If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
Antispam: Enter Dink Smallwood's last name (surname) below.
Formatting: :) :( ;( :P ;) :D >( : :s :O evil cat blood
Bold font Italic font hyperlink Code tags
Message:
 
 
February 1st 2010, 12:50 PM
custom_skull.gif
Skull
Peasant He/Him Finland bloop
A Disembodied Sod 
How could you not like something you haven't seen??

Trust me, I just know I would not like it even if I went and saw it.

Now that's a rather ignorant statement, Skull. I'd wager that a ton of man-hours and effort went into creating the effects for Avatar. It's not like they just slapped them together in a few spare days.

Sabre, I think you understood my point wrong, because I explained it a little unclearly. What I meant was that back in the days, it was obviously much more harder to work on those special effects and still, the classics have almost egual effects as the new ones. Another thing I meant was that they actually had to BUILD the computers that they made the special effects with. So they literally busted their ass for making the effects.

Also, yes, what makes this film so special is the 3d CGI. It's truly breathtaking. It will most certainly be talked about for years to come; I'd be stunned if it wasn't.

Nobody can say anything about that, because nobody can see to the future, but somehow I have the feeling that what you said will not happen. I'll guess there's just the opinion of waiting and seeing.